Three little Indians

Wow....all 3 look to be in great shape. I have a 10, but I dont cook in it for some reason. Are you going to use them? Anywyas, thats a great pic!
 
SeanD said:
Wow....all 3 look to be in great shape. I have a 10, but I dont cook in it for some reason. Are you going to use them? Anywyas, thats a great pic!
Click to expand...
Used the 7 for eggs this morning. I'll cook in them just to say i did but I'll probably just end up displaying them.
 
They look cool but I smell a repro. , one of the logos aren’t positioned correctly or uniformly . Handles look to not be consistent for some reason . Nevertheless they look neat
 
Patterns being handmade, there are going to be minor inconsistencies, especially between sizes. I don't see anything about these three that would cause concern. Fake Wapak Indians have really muddy indistinct logos and the most often-seen #4 has a regular skillet handle.
 
I agree. I dont see anything would say its a fake. Wapaks are Wapaks,,,,,every one is different. As a side note, I wish they would have used the Indian Head handle on more skillets, I love it!

Oh, and those all look as flawless as they come.
 
These all look like the real deal. As Doug said above, the #4 is really the only one seen faked, and it is really obvious. I currently have 3,8, and 9 skillets and sold a #10 Dutch oven with fully marked lid last year. The Indian Head pieces are really beautiful.
 
MikeLayton said:
They look cool but I smell a repro. , one of the logos aren’t positioned correctly or uniformly . Handles look to not be consistent for some reason . Nevertheless they look neat
Click to expand...
Definitely not repop. Way too crisp to be even considered a repop.
 
I just saw this.....2 of the skillets are medium thick, one is thin, and the 10 is thick. Mine is too......maybe they ground more off? Who knows.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top