Cast Iron Collector Forums  
Google

Go Back   Cast Iron Collector Forums > General Discussion > New Collector's Corner

Notices

New Collector's Corner A Friendly Forum for Those New to the Hobby. No Question Is Too Basic, So Ask Away.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-08-2020, 10:46 PM
EricC EricC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 467
Default Aebleskiver Vs. Egg Poacher

Hi -

There's been a few times that I've run across what appears to be an aebleskiver pan but described as an egg poacher.

Is this a misnomer or did some manufacturer(s) actually market this type of thing as an egg poacher?

(apologies is this info is already available and I overlooked it)
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 07-08-2020, 10:49 PM
Doug D. Doug D. is offline
Site Admin
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 6,071
Default Re: Aebleskiver Vs. Egg Poacher

Yes, an aebelskiver is often seen called an egg poacher. But I really can't see how it could, by definition, poach eggs, a process which requires simmering, slightly acidified water. Or, at the very least, a steam-saturated enclosed vessel.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-08-2020, 11:21 PM
EricC EricC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 467
Default Re: Aebleskiver Vs. Egg Poacher

Yes, agreed - I've seen modern egg poachers use shallow bowls to hold the eggs (I've never tried them, only ever poached in a regular saucepan) but it seems to me that trying to use CI for such a thing really wouldn't work well.

But those who call them egg poachers, is it just internet-echo-chamber of an incorrect description or did any manufacturers actually sell them described as egg poachers, as far as you know?

I just don't want to make some proclamation elsewhere that what's described as a CI egg poacher is actually an aebelskiver and then find out I posted false info, if I can avoid it. Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-09-2020, 09:08 AM
Doug D. Doug D. is offline
Site Admin
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 6,071
Default Re: Aebleskiver Vs. Egg Poacher

Lodge, Griswold and Wagner all called them a "Danish Cake Pan". Wagner catalogs, however, went on to say that the top rim of their #1314 made it "an ideal pan to use for poaching eggs", but offered no guidance on how that end might be achieved. (Fill with water? Cover?)

Some Griswold catalogs conversely called their rimless #31 pan an "Egg Poacher or Apple Cake Pan" when they also made a #32 with a rim. Other Griswold catalogs call the rimmed pan simply an Egg Poacher while at the same time calling the rimless pan a Danish Cake Pan.

Some older Lodge catalogs call theirs a Danish Cake Pan, subtitled "Or Egg Poacher". The pan was dropped from the line for some time before returning as a 32D, the 32 designation apparently being borrowed from Griswold and the D for Danish.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-09-2020, 08:27 PM
EricC EricC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 467
Default Re: Aebleskiver Vs. Egg Poacher

Thank you, exactly the answer I was seeking. And, once again, I learned something.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-23-2020, 07:19 AM
April King April King is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 4
Default Re: Aebleskiver Vs. Egg Poacher

To add, the image from the catalog, as described by @Doug.

As somebody who loves to make aebleskiver, I find it comical that the rimless one was called the danish cake pan. Without the rim you will get butter -everywhere-. It is a total disaster.

The "egg poacher" is much better for making aebleskiver than the actual aebleskiver pan depicted here.

Last edited by April King; 09-23-2020 at 07:24 AM. Reason: give up on image resizing
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-23-2020, 08:10 AM
Dan B Dan B is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Calagary
Posts: 96
Default Re: Aebleskiver Vs. Egg Poacher

A couple of things...
  1. Does anyone know the date of the catalogue page posted by April King? Reason being is that I am surprised how expensive they were "in the day".
  2. FYI - I frequently successfully make Aebleskivers in a rimless pan. If a bit careful, the butter stays in the indentations. Don't be sacred to pick one up if you come across it in the wild.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-23-2020, 08:47 AM
Doug D. Doug D. is offline
Site Admin
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 6,071
Default Re: Aebleskiver Vs. Egg Poacher

Those prices are cents each, not dollars. They are commensurate with those shown in a 1918 wholesale catalog reprint. 70 cents in 1918 is about $13 today.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-23-2020, 12:19 PM
April King April King is offline
New Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Posts: 4
Default Re: Aebleskiver Vs. Egg Poacher

As Doug said, these prices are cents and not dollars. This particular catalogue was published in 1915, I believe.

And yes, you can definitely make ębleskiver in rimless pans, but ones with rims are cheap and plentiful so I don't see any reason to worry about getting butter on your stove when you don't have to.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-24-2020, 07:53 AM
Dan B Dan B is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Calagary
Posts: 96
Default Re: Aebleskiver Vs. Egg Poacher

Wow... cents not dollars. A bit embarrassing.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Advertisement

This site is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program,
an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn
advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com or its affiliates.
This page contains ads and links that earn commissions for CIC.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.